djm4_lj: (Default)
djm4_lj ([personal profile] djm4_lj) wrote2009-06-09 03:21 pm
Entry tags:

Oh dear

I understand the temptation, but I very much doubt that anything Nick Griffin could have said in his press conference could have got him the publicity and made him look good to those who voted for him as being pelted by eggs outside Westminster. Doing this just makes him look like a martyr.

As a Liberal, I disapprove of treating any democratically elected representative this way, but even if you don't, I challenge you to convince me that this sort of protest doesn't just play straight into the BNP's hands. They want to be seen in the media being attacked and silenced - a lot of their core support are people who feel that they have no voice, so anything that looks as though this is a deliberate conspiracy to silence them will ring true.
babysimon: (Default)

[personal profile] babysimon 2009-06-09 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I would assume that by "people" [livejournal.com profile] palmer1984 means "people who voted BNP" or more generally "people watching the news" rather than "people reading this post". Your first paragraph seems to imply the latter - sorry if I'm miss-reading you.

[identity profile] friend-of-tofu.livejournal.com 2009-06-09 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Possibly. But it's so general it's hard to know. And are they reading this? Who is being advised here?

At any rate, that doesn't alter my point - what makes one think these "people" haven't already? Assuming voters-you-don't-agree-with are stupid or ignorant never strikes me as a good tactic.