djm4_lj: (Default)
[personal profile] djm4_lj
"There will often be as much interpretation of what a politician is saying, as there is coverage of them actually saying it."

Tony Blair, talking disapprovingly about the news.

Obviously, if you're a control-freak like Tony Blair, you would think that's a bad thing. Personally, I want our news media to interpret what our politicians say, rather than just slavishly reporting that they've said it. And many different points of view, and different information sources? Yes please!

In other news:

Paddy Ashdown continues to talk sense on Iraq, and foreign intervention in general.

Bisexual Underground tonight.

Date: 2007-06-12 01:48 pm (UTC)
djm4: (Default)
From: [personal profile] djm4
Yes. And this possibly could be an example of that.

Except that this is Tony Blair, who ran out of 'benefit of the doubt' room with me ages ago.

Date: 2007-06-12 02:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thekumquat.livejournal.com
Step 1 - establish what was said
Step 2 - decide whether what was said was what was meant. Cue interpretation in the media. Doing it in this order provides extra opportunities for the press to accuse Blair of lying, if appropriate...

Profile

djm4_lj: (Default)
djm4_lj

July 2015

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 03:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios